Physics and Information

Under construction

(comes from the main page “Mathesis universalis” [ENG])

… BELL demonstrated mathematically (resolution of the “Paradox EPR”) the need for an “unknown sub-quantum level” …  … with the phenomena of “Entanglement” in which there appears an exchange of information that eludes the material characteristics hitherto known (giving way to the Instantaneity, Delocalisation, …, which contradict the hypothesis of Relativity).

…  have recently discovered exceptional information processing capabilities (superposition and quantum computing) that the physicists want to apply. Has such exceptional processing capacity for physical particles existed for 14 billion years without being used to date? It is unquestionable that such information processing already existed from its inception, and can only be justified by the calculation of interactions with the other particles, to meet the strict intrinsic laws of physics.

But despite all this, physics continues to give up accepting information to explain its most basic phenomena, information that would avoid falling into a-causality, a current a-causality that contradicts its alleged condition of science. There is talk of information, !what remedy!, but as something marginal, still not intrinsically integrated in physical theory (it is not until 1959 that SZILÁRD associates entropy with information to solve one of the inconsistencies of Entropy, but there are other more much (see “Entropia“, 14 pages, in catalan language). Thus for more than a century, as a consequence of the unexpected implications (limit of “c”, …) of MAXWELL’s equations, when trying to justify them with the Einsteinian hypothesis of the “Dilation of time”, theoretical physics has fallen in repeated contradictions, absurdities, paradoxes and obscurantisms unfit for a science, until to practically infinite errors as in the “Vacuum catastrophe”.

There is a hypothesis that avoids all of the above, so it is strictly a correct theory. With it, information is introduced into the basis of physics in a fully empirical and calculable way. This is the “Processing time of the intrinsic information of physics” (a system of information previous and independent of the materialization, the “unknown sub-quantum level” required by BELL), which explains without any contradiction or paradoxes:

– all known relativistic phenomena (providing the necessary hemisimetricity and functionality in the LORENTZ Transformation, allowing the harmonization of Special and General Relativity);

– quantum phenomena (and harmonizing them with the relativists) and

– many others more.

A fifth dimension, the “Time of processing intrinsic/ quantum information”, that by the versatility of the information (as a CPU, wich can process all kinds of programs) does not require any more dimension (less still umpteen imaginaryNOT empirical– as in the “String theory”).

Physics must incorporate three new informational/ virtual concepts, which exist but are not real, do not belong to the material Universe:

– the underlying quantum-prematerial Information,

– your Processing, and

– the required Processing time (which, because of the aforementioned virtuality, does not manifest itself directly in our material Universe, manifests itself empirically indirectly, comparing the clocks of the systems in relative motion between them),

which allows us to explain the following outstanding questions of current physics, or avoid their contradictions, or improve their understanding, which fully validates the hypothesis (as opposed to the current “Dilatation”, unsatisfactory for its numerous contradictions, and for not solving any of the aforementioned following questions):

1) Hemi-symmetry of the reality of the Universe, with a dependent on the masses and invertible LORENTZ factor; Resolution of relativistic Paradoxes; ¿Increase in mass with speed?, or, ¿increase in kinetic energy by the “Local velocity”?

2) Individualized/ differentiated states of physical particles (due to their very many quantum superposition);

3) Quantum computing;

4) Physical delocalization; “Entanglement”; “Delayed-choice entanglement swapping”);

5) Vacuum energy; CASIMIR effect;

6) “Memory of water”; individuality of snow crystals; “Water – Life” association;

7) Principle of indetermination of HEISENBERG; Tunnel effect;

8) Limit of “c” in the transport of energy in the Universe; absence of mass in the photon; the Polaritón; surpass “c” in OPERA; surpass “c” in the diagrams of (STÜCKELBERG-) FEYNMAN;

9) Epitaxy (coordinated growth of crystals);

10) Radioactive decay;

11) Materialization (the so bad-called “Big Bang”); Black holes;

12) Entropy and its “disappearance”; Entropy in the materialization of the Universe (the so bad-called “Big Bang”);

13) Energy and Dark Matter;

14) Ether (informational) and unifier of the physical “Fields”;

15) Impossibility of “confinement” of the Quarks;

Faced with such affirmations, the reader may wonder what,

“If so, why has not such a theory been diffused and imposed?”

It is clear that this should be answered by the physicists of the “MainStream”, remembering the many cases of scandalous errors of the scientific community for cannot accepting new paradigms. To put a single example and related, the case of SUTTON in the early twentieth century, geneticists took half a century to accept the evidence of the role of DNA in the transmission of hereditary characteristics. Many scientists, whether physicists and/ or mathematicians (GÖDEL, ESSEN, SELLERI, …), have warned of the wrong direction that has had physics for 110 years.  And although it is harder and harder to accept that dogmatism and authoritarianism have hijacked physics, there are to have the courage to start over and reintegrate all the equations of theoretical physics since then, with the dissociation of time (the famous “dt”) in:

– “Material time” (the one that the clocks measure), of unity of measure always fixed, and

– “Processing time”, which is a variable function according to the different speeds of the systems considered (when we deal with high-speed phenomena).

everything that is treated in the following document  “Information or Dilatation”.  For a better understanding and contextualization, the following document has a predominantly pedagogical and anecdotal exposition.

Information or Dilatation“.  2015.  Brief and didactic summary of 11 pages with forceful arguments of a necessary change of paradigm of physics, based on information. Resolution of the antagonism between NEWTON and LEIBNIZ with respect to the Time. Resolution of the relativist contradictions and explanation of multiple questions of current physics already commented, how the 1), 7) and 8) above cited.

Other documents, some in Catalan and others in Castillian/ Spanish are not translated into English. They can be seen in the sub-menu “Física e Información” in Castillian/ Spanish).

… will follow



Next sub-menu “Life and Information